9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only carried out In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
The official court record is maintained with the court of record. Copies of case file documents are usually not readily available on the search site and will need to generally be ordered from the court of record.
For your foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden supplied to any reported judgment may depend upon the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]
Because of this, basically citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling another person to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this sort of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving within the neighborhood endeavoring to find their phone is likely to get more frustrating than it’s really worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is additionally a nicely-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity in the spend scale allowances of Stenographers from the District Judiciary is inside the crystal clear negation of the legislation laid down by the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. In case the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided from the click here decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability while in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not complete, but this is a wonderful starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.